Thursday, January 23, 2025
Lawyers Run The WorldGoogle Ordered to Pay $85 Million for Patent Infringement

Google Ordered to Pay $85 Million for Patent Infringement

-

- Advertisment -spot_img

SimpleAir’s US Patent No. 7,035,914, which covers a system and method used for data communication between network computers, was the subject of a patent infringement case against Google.  SimpleAir first claimed that Google, Microsoft, Samsung, Nokia and other tech firms had violated the patent in 2011.  All the companies settled with SimpleAir, except Google, which went on to fight the case in court.  US District Judge Rodney Gilstrap for the Eastern District of Texas oversaw the case which was recently concluded with a ruling that Google is to pay $85 Million to SimpleAir.

Whether there will be further appeals from Google or not is unknown, but they had already had a separate jury trial in January where they were the five claims of infringement were found to be valid.   The case focused specifically on several Google services, including Google Cloud Messaging and Cloud to Device Messaging.  These technologies are widely used in Android smart phones and tablets, including for push notifications to apps like Facebook, Gmail and Twitter.

The lead inventor and majority owner of SimpleAir said, “The jury understood that Google profits tremendously from its infringing use of our invention and we believe that is reflected in its verdict.  We appreciate the jury’s service and their fairness in considering and validating a large damages claim made by such a small company against a company that is so widely known.”

Google has not yet released a statement on the case, citing the fact that they don’t comment on ongoing legal proceedings, which may indicate that further appeals will be coming.

SmartAir originally sought to get $146 million in damages.  Google offered to settle for $6 million for both the past and future use of the intellectual property.  The patent expires in 2017.  This court decision is only applicable to past violations of the patent, and leaves Google open to further penalties for future use of these technologies.

Pesach Lattin
Pesach Lattinhttp://www.adotat.com
Pesach "Pace" Lattin is one of the top experts in interactive advertising, affiliate marketing. Pesach Lattin is known for his dedication to ethics in marketing, and focus on compliance and fraud in the industry, and has written numerous articles for publications from MediaPost, ClickZ, ADOTAS and his own blogs.

3 Comments

What's your opinion?

Latest news

Data, Dance, and Daring Campaigns: Erin Levzow’s Approach to Building Loyalty

How Mango Habanero, Metrics, and Masterful Moves Redefined Marketing Genius Every so often, a guest comes along who doesn’t just...

Streaming’s Big Lie: The Future of TV Is Already Broke

Streaming was supposed to be the savior of TV—the rebellious new kid with no commercials, endless content, and an...

How to Narrow the Scope of Information Sought by an FTC Civil Investigative Demand (CID)

A civil investigative demand (“CID”) is the instrument by which the Federal Trade Commission exercises its compulsory process authority...

Did Your Company Receive a Letter From the FTC?  FTC Warning Letters and Notices of Penalty Offense

Recipients of FTC warning letters and notices of penalty offense should be on high alert and act quickly. ...

The Good, the Bad, and the SPO-ly

The Hidden Flaws Behind Ad Tech’s Favorite Buzzword. Supply Path Optimization (SPO) is my love-hate relationship in ad tech personified....

 2024: Goodbye Impressions, Hello Attention

Attention Metrics: The Ad Industry’s New Favorite Buzzword  2024 will forever be known as the year advertisers got collectively obsessed...

Must read

Data, Dance, and Daring Campaigns: Erin Levzow’s Approach to Building Loyalty

How Mango Habanero, Metrics, and Masterful Moves Redefined Marketing...

Streaming’s Big Lie: The Future of TV Is Already Broke

Streaming was supposed to be the savior of TV—the...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you