Monday, January 20, 2025
Lawyers Run The WorldFTC Goes After Virus Advertising

FTC Goes After Virus Advertising

-

- Advertisment -spot_img

Jesta Digital, a mobile company which according to their website delivers content, music, games and apps to its customers recently settled a lawsuit brought on by the FTC for $1.2 million as well as issuing refunds to a large number of customers.  What did Jesta do which warranted the lawsuit?  According to the FTC complaint filed, In August 2011 Jesta began running deceptive banner advertisements on the free version of their hugely popular Angry Birds app for Android devices.

The advertisement, which looked like an official Android notice, placed a banner in the app which alerted users that a virus was detected, and offered a button to remove it.  The problem is, however, that the app never scanned the phone, or found any type of virus to prompt this warning.  As if this weren’t enough, those who clicked the banner ad were subscribed to a $9.99 monthly contract to download 20 ringtones and other items.  This monthly payment was placed directly on the subscriber’s cell phone bill.

Out of 100,000 subscribers, only 372 actually made it to the point where they were able to download any type of anti-virus software.  Ironically, even those who did get to download the mobile anti-virus program didn’t even need it because their device wasn’t infected with any virus or malware to begin with.

T-Mobile, a large cell phone provider, was receiving so many calls from subscribers about the charges that they threatened to cut off billing for Jesta, or fine them.  The FTC quoted Jesta’s director of global marketing who said in an email, “If I got a bill for $9.99/mo and don’t even remember downloading a shitty ringtone then I’d be more inclined to make sure I got my money back.  Not just that, but they have a stronger case to plead ignorance if they didn’t download anything.  Maybe not directly correlated, but still a terrible user experience.”

With comments like that from executives within the company, it is not surprising that Jesta Digital wanted to settle this case as quickly as possible.  Marc Greenwald, co-chair of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan who represented Jesta, said “Jesta is pleased to have resolved this issue.  This one advertising campaign was shut down as soon as Jesta management learned about it.  Jesta’s advertising campaigns are all compliant with or exceed standards set by the Mobile Marketing Association.”

In the settlement the company did not admit or deny wrongdoing.  In addition to the fines and refunds, Jesta is barred from making deceptive statements about viruses and anti-virus software, the cost of goods or services, or the conditions of a purchase.  They are also required to receive express, verifiable, authorization from a consumer prior to charging them any fees or placing any fees on their mobile phone bill.  Of course, all mobile companies are barred from these types of deceptive advertising techniques anyway, but apparently the courts felt Jesta needed a little extra reminding.

Jesta Digital is a part of the Jesta Group, which is a global real estate and hospitality investment firm.  They were purchased from Fox Mobile Group, which was owned by News Corp, in 2010.   Jesta Digital has headquarters in Las Angeles, Berlin and New York City.

You can see the settlement details HERE, and FTC Complaint HERE.

Pesach Lattin
Pesach Lattinhttp://www.adotat.com
Pesach "Pace" Lattin is one of the top experts in interactive advertising, affiliate marketing. Pesach Lattin is known for his dedication to ethics in marketing, and focus on compliance and fraud in the industry, and has written numerous articles for publications from MediaPost, ClickZ, ADOTAS and his own blogs.

2 Comments

What's your opinion?

Latest news

Data, Dance, and Daring Campaigns: Erin Levzow’s Approach to Building Loyalty

How Mango Habanero, Metrics, and Masterful Moves Redefined Marketing Genius Every so often, a guest comes along who doesn’t just...

Streaming’s Big Lie: The Future of TV Is Already Broke

Streaming was supposed to be the savior of TV—the rebellious new kid with no commercials, endless content, and an...

How to Narrow the Scope of Information Sought by an FTC Civil Investigative Demand (CID)

A civil investigative demand (“CID”) is the instrument by which the Federal Trade Commission exercises its compulsory process authority...

Did Your Company Receive a Letter From the FTC?  FTC Warning Letters and Notices of Penalty Offense

Recipients of FTC warning letters and notices of penalty offense should be on high alert and act quickly. ...

The Good, the Bad, and the SPO-ly

The Hidden Flaws Behind Ad Tech’s Favorite Buzzword. Supply Path Optimization (SPO) is my love-hate relationship in ad tech personified....

 2024: Goodbye Impressions, Hello Attention

Attention Metrics: The Ad Industry’s New Favorite Buzzword  2024 will forever be known as the year advertisers got collectively obsessed...

Must read

Data, Dance, and Daring Campaigns: Erin Levzow’s Approach to Building Loyalty

How Mango Habanero, Metrics, and Masterful Moves Redefined Marketing...

Streaming’s Big Lie: The Future of TV Is Already Broke

Streaming was supposed to be the savior of TV—the...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you